Sunday, June 24, 2012

Drug Meeting Spotlight on Peru's Cocaine Problem



Peru's struggle with a resurgent cocaine trade is in the spotlight as it hosts nearly 60 nations in conference on illicit drugs beginning Monday.
The Andean country's cocaine production likely now exceeds Colombia's, making it the world's No. 1 source of the illicit drug, the United States and United Nations say.
President Ollanta Humala said when he took office a year ago that he'd make the drug war a priority, and his government announced an ambitious antinarcotics plan in March.
So far, though, the corrupting influence of drug money has badly weakened Peru's law enforcement agencies and judiciary, consistently frustrating money-laundering and drug prosecutions, says the counter-narcotics chief in the attorney general's office, Sonia Medina.
"There is a paralysis at the moment" she said last week, with honest, committed judges and prosecutors scant.
There is no shortage, meanwhile, of cocaine, which Peru supplies to neighbors including Brazil, the world's No. 2 consumer after the United States, as well as a growing European market.
Under the previous administration of President Alan Garcia, eradication of Peru's coca crop, the raw material of cocaine, did not keep pace with new plantings.
In October, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration intelligence chief Rodney Benson said Peru surpassed Colombia in 2010 "in potential pure cocaine production" and was at about 325 metric tons a year compared to 270 metric tons from Colombia.
From 2006 to 2010, the area under coca cultivation in Peru jumped 35 percent to 236 square miles (61,200 hectares), the U.N. says. That's s double the size of the crop in Bolivia, the No. 3 cocaine-producing nation.
Colombia's coca crop encompasses nearly twice as much area as Peru's by U.S. measure but gets thinned regularly by herbicides sprayed by planes flown by U.S. contractors. Peru's coca fields, by contrast, yield more because their mature plants are mostly untouched by eradication. And unlike in Colombia, the only eradication done in Peru is by hand.
The U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime's representative for Peru, Flavio Mirella, told The Associated Press this year that "drug trafficking is in full growth" in the country and "could get out of hand."
Peru aims to counter that by reducing the area under coca cultivation by 30 percent by 2016. Peru's drug czar, Carmen Masias, told the AP when the plan was released that there are no "liberated zones" in the country exempt from eradication.
Yet areas that produce some of Peru's best-quality coca remain untouched by eradicators. Many are protected by armed gangs, including those in the Monzon region of the Upper Huallaga Valley of central Peru, experts say.
About 55 percent of Peru's coca crop is in the Ene and Apurimac Valley to the south, where the presence of leftist Shining Path rebels is so strong that the government hasn't yet dared try to eradicate. The rebels have killed more than 70 government troops in the region since 2008.
The United States has firmly backed the Humala government's counterdrug efforts and shares Peru's opposition to drug decriminalization, which is not on the official agenda for this week's conference.
That omission has upset drug production and transit nations promoting a debate on legalization, arguing that they are paying too heavy a price trying to fight traffickers.
"We've had 40 years of the fight against drugs and that's time enough to evaluate whether a strategy is successful or not," said Guatemala's ambassador to Peru, Gabriel Aguilera.
"In those 40 years neither demand nor supply has been substantially reduced. Nor has the violence diminished."
Proponents of legalization were heartened when Uruguay announced plans last week to legalize and sell marijuana and use the revenues to strengthen the fight harder drugs.
———
Associated Press writer Franklin Briceno contributed to this report.

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Uruguay aims to legalize, oversee marijuana market


Related Topics

MONTEVIDEO | Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:00pm EDT
(Reuters) - Uruguay's government unveiled a proposal on Wednesday to legalize and monitor the marijuana market, arguing that the drug is less harmful than the black market where it is trafficked.
President Jose Mujica's leftist government will send a bill to Congress shortly on this as part of a package of measures to fight crime in the SouthAmerican country.
The government will also urge that marijuana sales be legalized worldwide, Defense Minister Eleuterio Fernandez Huidobro said, adding the measure could discourage the use of so-called hard drugs.
Marijuana consumption is already legal in Uruguay.
"We want to fight against two different things: one is drug consumption and the other is drug trafficking. We think the ban on certain drugs is creating more problems in society than the drug itself," the minister told a news conference.
"Homicides related to settling scores have increased and that's a clear sign that certain phenomena are appearing in Uruguay that didn't exist before," he said.
The bill would legalize and set rules for the production and sale of marijuana but would not allow people to grow the plant for their own personal use. The government did not give details on how the new system would work.
In Uruguay about $75 million changes hands each year in the illegal marijuana trade, according to official estimates.
As of last year, 20 percent of people between 15 and 65 years old reported they had smoked marijuana at least once and about 5 percent of respondents were habitual users.
The proposal to legalize the marijuana market is one of 15 crime-fighting measures that include tougher penalties for police corruption, crack-cocaine trafficking and juvenile offenders.
(Writing by Hilary Burke; editing by Christopher Wilson)

Monday, June 18, 2012

A former L.A. cop calls for legalizing drugs


'Prohibition is not the answer and it will never be the answer, because it does not and will not work,' says Stephen Downing. He favors legalizing, regulating and controlling illicit substances.

  • Email
    Share
pot shops
"Prohibition is not the answer and it will never be the answer, because it does not and will not work," former Los Angeles police officer Stephen Downing says of marijuana. (Genaro Molina / Los Angeles Times)


Stephen Downing speaks fondly of his 20 years with the Los Angeles Police Department, saying he misses the camaraderie and the integrity of the people he worked with in a career that took him from street cop to deputy chief. Along the way, as commander of the Bureau of Investigations, he oversaw the Administrative Narcotics Division.

And so when we had lunch at a sidewalk cafe in Long Beach the other day, it was more than a little strange to hear this life-long Republican insist that for the sake of cops, and in the interest of logic and public safety, the United States ought to legalize drugs.


You might be tempted to ask yourself, OK, what's this guy smoking?


But he's never touched any illegal drugs, Downing insisted. Not one puff, and nary a snort.

The way he sees it, the war on drugs hasn't reduced drug use and the violence that accompanies it; it's made matters worse. Law enforcement and the drug lords have been in an arms race for more than 40 years, perpetuating their own existence in a never-ending escalation that has bloated prison budgets and robbed us of funding for education and basic human services. The killing fields hold the bodies of cops, dealers and innocent victims. And still, after incalculable costs in blood and money, neither the supply nor the demand has abated.

Downing sent me a note after reading my column two weeks ago, in which I questioned drug policy priorities and drew a connection between U.S. consumption and the 50,000 bodies piled up in Mexico's drug wars.

"When I started, the show-and-tells for the media were a kilo or two, a couple of handguns and a few thousand dollars in cash," Downing wrote, referring to the news conferences called by the LAPD to celebrate its busts. "Today it's warehouses full of dope, pallets of cash and tens of thousands of war level weapons. That alone should tell us something about failed policy."

When Downing talks about legalizing drugs, he means we should "legalize, regulate and control" illicit substances. But he isn't referring only to marijuana, even though he finds it illogical that marijuana is illegal while alcohol and tobacco — proven killers — are perfectly legal. He's talking about legalizing cocaine, heroinmethamphetamine, Ecstasy, the whole underground kaleidoscope.

With all those drugs, Downing said, "prohibition is not the answer and it will never be the answer, because it does not and will not work." About five years ago he was recruited by Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, which advocates for drug policy reform that would treat addiction as more of a health issue and divert savings to better uses.

"We have bravely fought the war on drugs for more than 40 years — arresting, prosecuting and imprisoning at ever-increasing levels," reads a statement on the group's website. "We have spent well over a trillion dollars and made more than 39 million arrests of nonviolent drug users. Ask yourself this simple question: Has it worked? As most of us can answer from experience: No."

Downing joined the LAPD in 1960 and moved quickly through the ranks, serving as commander of the juvenile division and then commander of special investigations, overseeing narcotics. He saw the beginnings of the Bloods and Crips, heard President Nixon's declaration of war on drugs, and watched rivers of federal money flow to create increasingly militarized police departments.

"Even small departments have gotten all this equipment," said Downing, who wrote and produced TV shows after leaving the LAPD and now lives in Long Beach. "I went to the Christmas parade last year, and they've got a big armored vehicle running down the street. At Christmas!"

Downing said that as a cop going after drug dealers, it gradually became clear to him that he might as well have been fighting the mythical Hydra — cut off one of the snake's heads, and two more sprout.

"We had a police officer shot in crossfire on a drug raid, and he went into a wheelchair for life, and I'm thinking, 'Wow, this guy's like this because he was trying to keep an addict from getting his heroin?' We had another cop killed in a buy-bust.... He shot him in the face. And this weighs on you, and you ask, 'What is the value of what we're doing?' "

Since then, California's prison population has exploded, gangs still control drug trade from inside and outside of prison, Mexican cartel violence has become all the more savage and law enforcement policy remains largely unchanged. Part of the reason, Downing suspects, is that law enforcers have gotten dependent on the asset seizures that are divvied up among various agencies and used to keep the whole thing humming along.

"There is not one metric that says this policy approach is working," said Downing, who believes decriminalization would lower drug prices and profits and defang criminal enterprises. He noted that the leaders of several Latin American countries have begun calling for an exploration of legalization.

I asked UCLA professor Mark Kleiman, who teaches courses on drug policy, what he thought about all of this, and he sounded a more cautious note.

"If we legalized all drugs," he said, "there'd be smaller illegal profits, less violence among dealers, safer drugs and fewer people behind bars."

"We'd also have vastly more drug addiction and more crimes and accidents due to intoxication," Kleiman added. "There's no magic formula to end the drug problem. Details matter, and not all drugs are alike. I'd like to see cannabis made legally available for use by adults. I don't want to extend that to cocaine, heroin or methamphetamine."

OK, said Downing. Let's start with pot, regulate and control it as we do the wine industry (which would be a vast improvement over the current hodgepodge of medical marijuana laws), study the results, and learn what we can from countries that are decriminalizing other drugs.

"The harm to society is too great," he said, "to keep going as we are."

steve.lopez@latimes.com

Saturday, June 16, 2012

Legalize pure ecstasy and sell it like alcohol, B.C. health chief says


  Jun 14, 2012 – 8:19 AM ET Last Updated: Jun 15, 2012 9:52 AM ET
Nick Procaylo/Postmedia News
Nick Procaylo/Postmedia News
Ecstasy seized in Vancouver.
In this occasional feature, the National Post tells you everything you need to know about a complicated issue. Today, Tristin Hopper looks at B.C.’s fresh drug debate:
Q: B.C.’s chief medical officer, Dr. Perry Kendall, told The Canadian Press on Wednesday that the drug MDMA (“ecstasy”) is safe in pure form. Didn’t it kill all those people? 
A: Over the last year, 16 people in Alberta, B.C., and Saskatchewan have indeed died after ingesting ecstasy. But the problem was not the ecstasy itself, it was an added ingredient, PMMA, that caused the users’ body temperatures to rocket to lethal levels. Dr, Kendall posited this week that if production of MDMA was regulated, and if it was sold in government-regulated liquor stores, it would keep users out of the morgue. An Australian paper released this week would seem to agree. On Wednesday, researchers at the Royal Perth Hospital reported that increasingly impure ecstasy had recently caused three otherwise healthy Perth residents to suffer severe heart attacks. “The drug can be stronger than you expect or it can contain other chemicals, so you can’t rely on what’s being sold to you because it’s completely unregulated,” report spokesman Daniel Fatovich told the Western Australian.
Q: So if it’s the impurities that are killing people, does that mean MDMA is harmless? 
A: In pure form, research shows that a reasonable amount of ecstasy is not lethal, but that doesn’t mean it’s entirely free of side effects. Toronto’s Centre for Addiction and Mental Health lists more than a dozen MDMA side effects, although much of them are in league with alcohol, such as sweating, dehydration, blurred vision, nausea, vomiting, depression and liver damage. MDMA’s most well-known side-effect is teeth-grinding and jaw clenching, which can result in dental damage. It is why ravers will often suck on a pacifier during an ecstasy trip.
Q: Still, it won’t kill you if it’s kept pure. Do the police care? 
A: It doesn’t matter if they care, since, in the eyes of the law, ecstasy remains in league with cocaine, crystal meth and date rape drug GHB. Regardless, the RCMP resolutely maintain that any amount of ecstasy – even pure ecstasy – is “extremely dangerous.” In February, a spokesman for the Coquitlam RCMP told a Vancouver reporter “there is no such thing as a good batch or a bad batch. Every single batch represents a dangerous drug with a serious health risk.”
Q: Are impurities a problem with other illegal drugs? 
A: Ironically, Canada’s “controlled substances,” are among the country’s least-controlled commodities. To evade the scrutiny of law enforcement, narcotics are often prepared in concealed, unhygienic conditions with almost no incentive for quality control. In Canada, police raids have uncovered poorly ventilated ecstasy labs stuffed in residential garages and filled with dirty equipment.
Q: Marijuana is entirely legal as long as you use it for medical purposes. Is there a medical case to be made for ecstasy? 
A: Created exactly 100 years ago by German pharmaceutical maker Merck, the intended purpose of MDMA was as a blood-clotting agent – although it did not work. Recently, in clinical trials the drug has shown increasing promise as an effective treatment for schizophrenia, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and Parkinson’s Disease. Last year, a joint British-Australian research team found initial evidence that an altered form of MDMA could combat blood cancers such as leukemia. In late May, David Nutt, a former chief advisor on drugs to the British government, said controls on psychedelic drugs were blocking valuable efforts to test the drug’s medical benefits. “Regulations, which are arbitrary, actually make it virtually impossible to research these drugs,” Mr. Nutt told a London press briefing in May.
Q: Aren’t there similar, reportedly safer, drugs that are legal? 
A: Less and less. For anybody with $20 to spend on a pill, back in 2008 there were plenty of pill-based legal ecstasy alternatives on offer, usually from the same stores selling sex toys or marijuana paraphernalia. Said to be a safe alternative to MDMA, the pills’ most common active ingredients were BZP and TFMPP, both from a chemical class known as piperazines. Although the pills are not criminalized, they are not authorized for sale in Canada, and after a March amendment to Canada’s Food and Drug Regulations, the pills can now be legally seized by law enforcement.
National Post 
• Email: thopper@nationalpost.com