Thursday, March 27, 2014

Chris Christie: Marijuana is a 'gateway drug' that I will never legalize in New Jersey

from washingtonexaminer


Photo - During New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's "Ask the Governor" program on New Jersey radio station 101.5 FM, he was asked by a caller whether the governor would consider legalizing marijuana to bring in more tax revenue into the state. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

During New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's "Ask the Governor" program on New Jersey radio station 101.5 FM, he was asked by a caller whether the governor would consider legalizing marijuana to bring in more tax revenue into the state.
"Mike, I love you baby, but it ain't happening, not while I'm governor," Christie said to the caller.
Christie said that he understood the argument for more revenue, but said that it was wasn't an "even exchange."
"I don't believe that legalizing an illegal drug for purposes of governmental profit is something that we should be doing. I believe that this is a gateway drug into other more serious drugs, I think it sends a wrong message to our kids and I don't think it makes anybody a better or more productive person," he said.
Christie explained that that he compromised by allowing medicinal marijuana in New Jersey, but said as long as he was the governor, recreational use of marijuana would never be legalized.
Christie also indicated that he would not consider decriminalization of marijuana.
"Is that Chris Christie the father or Chris Christie the former federal prosecutor talking?" asked the host.
"Yes," Christie said flatly. "Both."

Saturday, March 15, 2014

Government approves medical marijuana research

from latimes 


A University of Arizona study, which still requires DEA approval, would examine whether pot can help veterans cope with post-traumatic stress. The green light may clear the way for broader studies.


Mississippi marijuana farm
Under existing federal rules, studies on the effects of marijuana can use pot only from this government-run farm in Mississippi. Researchers say that the agency that oversees the farm, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, has long been hostile to proposals aimed at examining possible benefits of the drug. (Kevin Bain / University of Mississippi / August 19, 2008)


March 14, 20145:00 p.m.



WASHINGTON — The Obama administration handed backers of medical marijuana a significant victory Friday, opening the way for a University of Arizona researcher to examine whether pot can help veterans cope with post-traumatic stress, a move that could lead to broader studies into potential benefits of the drug.
For years, scientists who have wanted to study how marijuana might be used to treat illness say they have been stymied by resistance from federal drug officials.
The Arizona study had long ago been sanctioned by the Food and Drug Administration, but under federal rules, such experiments can use marijuana only from a single, government-run farm in Mississippi. Researchers say the agency that oversees the farm, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, has long been hostile to proposals aimed at examining possible benefits of the drug.
"This is a great day," said the Arizona researcher, Suzanne A. Sisley, clinical assistant professor of psychology at the university's medical school, who has been trying to get the green light for her study for three years. "The merits of a rigorous scientific trial have finally trumped politics.
"We never relented," Sisley said. "But most other scientists have chosen not to even apply. The process is so onerous. With the implementation of this study and the data generated, this could lead to other crucial research projects."
Backers of medical marijuana hailed the news as an indication that the government had started coming to terms with one of the more striking paradoxes of federal drug policy: Even as about 1 million Americans are using marijuana legally to treat ailments, scientists have had difficulty getting approval to study how the drug might be employed more effectively.
"The political dynamics are shifting," said Rick Doblin, executive director of the Multidisciplinary Assn. for Psychedelic Studies, or MAPS, a group based in Santa Cruz that is raising money to help fund studies such as Sisley's. The group counts several prominent philanthropists among its backers, including two Pritzkers and a Rockefeller.
Government officials said the approval did not represent a change in underlying policy — just a recognition that Sisley's proposal meets official standards for research using illegal drugs. The research still requires approval of one more agency, the Drug Enforcement Administration, but Sisley and Doblin expressed confidence that that would prove a lesser hurdle.
In its letter approving the application, a government review panel noted what it called "significant changes" in the study that justified approving it now. Doblin said the changes did not affect the "core design" of the study.
Federal restrictions on pot research have been a source of tension for years. Researchers, marijuana advocates and some members of Congress have accused the National Institute on Drug Abuse of hoarding the nation's only sanctioned research pot for studies aimed at highlighting the drug's ill effects. They had pointed to Sisley's experience as a prime example of what they called an irrational and disjointed federal policy.
"You have impossible burdens," said Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), who has enlisted other members of Congress to lobby the administration to give researchers more access to the drug.
"These are not people who are going to be involved with some clandestine production of the drug or do something nefarious. They are trying to do scientific research that will add to the body of knowledge and safety," he said.
Blumenauer likes to recount the story of a doctor who works with children who have violent epileptic seizures. The children's parents "have found that the use of marijuana has reduced the frequency and intensity of these horrific episodes. But because of our stupid research policies, it is easier for the parent to get medical marijuana than for a researcher," he said.
Scientists say more research could help determine more precisely which ailments the drug can treat and could eventually lead to regulation by the FDA as a prescription drug. That would allow patients to know what they are consuming. Currently, users of medical marijuana often have little information about the potency and purity of the pot they buy. Physicians who prescribe the drug do so on the basis of evidence that is largely anecdotal.
At the core of the debate is an issue that has implications for both research and the movement to legalize marijuana for recreational use, as Colorado and Washington have done. Currently, federal law classifies pot as more dangerous than cocaine and methamphetamine. As a "Schedule 1" drug, marijuana is designated as having "no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse," as well as being a drug that puts users at risk of "severe psychological or physical dependence."
Researchers say that classification needs to change for science to proceed uninhibited. Making the change, though, would be a retreat in the war on drugs. The Obama administration could reschedule the drug without congressional action, but has shown no inclination to wade into that fight.
In the last 10 years, the government had approved just one U.S. research center to conduct clinical trials involving marijuana use for medical purposes — a UC San Diego facility created by the California Legislature.
The scientist who runs that center, Igor Grant, said his success in getting Washington's sign-off was due in large part to something other scientists do not have: the full force of the state. Blocking his work would have been a direct affront to lawmakers in Sacramento, he noted.
Grant's studies looked at such questions as whether pot could help ease the nausea and vomiting associated with cancer treatment or the severe appetite suppression experienced by those with HIV, which causes AIDS.
"Every one of those studies showed, in the short term, a beneficial effect," Grant said. "There is very good evidence cannabis is helpful."
Halper reported from Washington and Carcamo from Tucson.


http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-pot-research-20140315,0,6211983.story#ixzz2w6JnB3Eq


Here’s yet another strange side effect of the government’s position on pot

from washingtonpost

(Ed Andrieski/AP)
(Ed Andrieski/AP)
Here’s another weird side effect of the government’s balancing act when it comes to weed that is newly legal in two states: the FBI will run background checks for Colorado, but it won’t for Washington, according to the Associated Press.
Both states want the checks on prospective marijuana business owners because they want to keep organized crime out of the newly legal industry. The fact that the FBI will help one and not the other underscores the bizarre position the feds find themselves in.
The federal government’s response to the legalization laws in both states was critical to their success. The administration could have fought legalization, but it didn’t. In late August, Deputy Attorney General James Cole released a now-famous memo urging federal prosecutors to focus their “limited” resources on more serious violations when it comes to legal pot. The subtext was fairly clear: We won’t go after your new laws as long as you legalize pot safely. The trouble is background checks would help states do just that. The AP summed it up nicely:
The Obama administration has said it wants the states to make sure pot revenue doesn’t go to organized crime and that state marijuana industries don’t become a cover for the trafficking of other illegal drugs. At the same time, it might be tough for the FBI to stomach conducting such background checks — essentially helping the states violate federal law.
The government is basically telling Washington to keep crime out of legal marijuana but without the help of the FBI, which, by the way, is helping Colorado.
AP asked FBI about the discrepancy. The agency directed comment to the Department of Justice, which only issued a written statement saying “the department has been reviewing its background check policies, and we hope to have guidance for states in the near term.”
The AP report unveils a strange inconsistency is the federal government’s approach, but even some efforts to add clarity haven’t worked out. For instance, all businesses, including pot dispensaries, need banks. The problem is banks are banned from supporting illegal activity. The government issued guidance last month that, as with the Cole memo, suggested it would look the other way, but banks are still reluctant until the drug is legalized federally.
“[G]uidance or regulation doesn’t alter the underlying challenge for banks,” American Bankers Association President Frank Keating said in a statement last month. “As it stands, possession or distribution of marijuana violates federal law, and banks that provide support for those activities face the risk of prosecution and assorted sanctions.”
States can legalize pot, but businesses will have to deal with various kinds of uncertainty unless the federal government does, too.


Thursday, March 13, 2014

‘Cannabis Madness’ Revives Debate Over Medical Marijuana and Epilepsy

from time



Sanjay Gupta follows a family on a quest to get their two-year-old daughter a medicine that might treat her potentially fatal condition

When the Wilson family arrived in Colorado a few days ago, they already had a two-month supply of medicine for their two-year-old daughter Vivian. Brian and Meghan Wilson, along with their older daughter, have just joined a growing population of “medical refugees,” those who have uprooted their lives elsewhere so they can get medical marijuana in a state where it is abundant and legal—even though there is little science assuring them that marijuana could be the cure for condition’s like Vivian’s severe epilepsy.
The Wilsons, originally from New Jersey, are the focus of Dr. Sanjay Gupta’s second documentary on medical marijuana, Weed 2Cannabis Madness.He says the film is not “pro-marijuana.” But it would be easy to think otherwise after watching CNN’s hour-long program that debuted on March 11. “It’s the politics of pot, pitting policy against patients,” Gupta says in a voiceover at the outset of the show, a follow-up to a program on the same topic that ran last year. “Trapped in the middle: sick, qualified people who want medical marijuana but can’t get it.”
Gupta calls marijuana a plant “that can work wonders” and presents the plight of families who are using the drug to help ailing children to make his larger case: that legal restrictions on the drug are keeping needy patients from potentially lifesaving medicine. (CNN and Time Inc. are both owned by Time Warner.)
The Wilsons have been in the spotlight since having a high-profile dustup with Governor Chris Christie, when Brian demanded that he address medical marijuana laws in New Jersey at a diner drop-by. Vivian has a resistance to traditional medications, and after battling for months in their home state to get a strain said to help stop seizures, they eventually moved west. Meghan says that when they arrived in late February, Vivian was worse for a few days, banging her head and seeming dehydrated. She improved for a few days and now seems to be back to her old self, despite being administered does of a promising strain called Charlotte’s Web. “It’s been a bit of a roller coaster so far,” Meghan tells TIME.
For Gupta, the “cannabis madness” is that the Wilsons and other families have to go to such great lengths to try the drug. For other experts, the madness is that the federal government has made researching the beneficial effects of marijuana so difficult, leaving doctors with a dearth of results on which to base medical opinions. “I don’t want to fall into the trap that doctors and patients have fallen into throughout all of medical history,” epilepsy expert Dr. Orrin Devinsky tells TIME. “People use treatments that seem like they work, and it’s very clear to everybody that they work, until someone finally does a randomized controlled trial. So many things that have received tremendous popular attention … just don’t have beneficial effects, and in some cases their harms clearly outweigh their benefits.”
Devinsky, who has treated Vivian, says that he certainly hopes marijuana will prove as beneficial as many believe. But he cautions that there is little literature on its use in treating epilepsy beyond old studies and trials using non-human animals. A big reason for that is that the federal government still lists marijuana as a Schedule I drug, which classifies it as highly addictive and having no redeeming medical value. And that makes getting approval to study its benefits both necessary and difficult. Those advocating to reform marijuana laws believe that the drug should beclassified at a lower level, if not declassified completely.
One reason Gupta’s documentary is airing now, however, is that the federal government appears to be giving medical marijuana research a yellow light, just as it has gently eased its approach to the drug with banking and law enforcement. Devinsky is part of the first study of cannabis’ effects on epilepsy that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. He and a handful of U.S. doctors will be administering a drug called Epidiolex to young patients. Epidiolex is an extract that has extremely low levels of THC—the substance in marijuana that gets users high—and high levels of a substance called cannabidiol, known as CBD. (As does Charlotte’s Web, the strain Vivian is using.) Devinsky spent six months working with the FDA, the Drug Enforcement Agency and other federal departments before getting approval to begin the study this year, even though Epidiolex can’t get anyone high.
Dr. Bonni Goldstein, a pediatrician who now works as the medical director for a company that evaluates patients for medical marijuana recommendations in California, believes the hesitancy to allow studies is rooted in misguided belief in “old propaganda” about the dangers of the drug. (She also consults for Ghost Group, a venture capital firm focused on the legal weed industry.) Goldstein is full of stories about what a dramatic difference she has seen in patients who have tried medical marijuana, how it has changed lives and given hope to young people who thought there was no medicine to deal with their pain. “It’s really sad that the medical community does not want to embrace it,” she says. “You cannot help but notice, you’re hearing the same results over and over again.”
Goldstein believes more doctors would herald the powers of marijuana if they had the same education she’s gotten through first-hand experience. Patients, she says, are often left in the dark nowadays too, trusting that they’re getting what is advertised at dispensaries—that a strain has a true ratio of CBD to THC, say—in an industry that is largely unregulated on those fronts. In Weed 2, the Wilsons desperately attempt to turn marijuana leaves into an oil they can administer to their child and admit that they really don’t know exactly what they’re giving her. Now that they’re in Colorado, and getting the advice of doctors, Meghan says they’re really still experimenting. “Generally speaking, people using marijuana, especially parents treating their kids with it, we’re kind of paving our own road,” she says.
Gupta and Devinsky, who wrote an op-ed on his doubtsabout medical marijuana for the New York Times, don’t always see eye to eye. “The science is pretty clear,” Gupta tells TIME, noting that his confidence comes partly from evidence about how the human system generally reacts to marijuana rather than experiments where it is used to treat specific ailments. “We don’t know the long-term effects … but this is why we want to study it.” He notes that the medicines currently on the market for treating conditions like epilepsy have unknown and potentially serious side effects, too. Though he was once on the other side of the debate, Gupta now says medical marijuana should be legalized on a federal level.
Devinsky says that as Vivian’s doctor, he neither advised the family to use medical marijuana, nor cautioned against it. And he understands why they chose to move to Colorado when nothing else seemed to work. “Do we have proof it works? Absolutely not. Do we have proof it’s safe? Absolutely not,” he says. “If it was my daughter and I lived in Colorado, and she had failed to respond to all the existing medications, there’s a good chance I would try it.”
Meghan says that despite seeing mixed results so far, she still has faith that the family made the right choice. “There’s a lot of fine-tuning, and we have to be very patient,” she says. “We’re in this for the long haul.”

Does medical marijuana equal bad parenting?

from cnn


By Stephanie Smith, CNN
updated 8:29 AM EDT, Thu March 13, 2014




Shawnee's son was removed from his parents' custody and spent 12 days in foster care.
Shawnee's son was removed from his parents' custody and spent 12 days in foster care



STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Use of medical marijuana may cause parents to run afoul of child welfare groups
  • Cases are handled the same way regardless of the drug, a spokesman says
  • Marijuana use does not make someone a bad parent, according to an advocate
  • Most medical marijuana laws do not address the issue
Don't miss a special "WEED2: Cannabis Madness" edition of "Sanjay Gupta MD" at 4:30 p.m. ET Saturday and 7:30 a.m. ET Sunday.

Napa, California (CNN) -- Shawnee's voice is shrill, quavering -- on the edge of desperate. She clutches her 11-month-old son while trying to comprehend the situation unfolding in front of her.
Her boyfriend -- her child's father, Aaron -- is in handcuffs.
"Why are you doing this?" she pleads with police officers standing on the lawn outside her home.
"Your baby doesn't need to be subjected to marijuana," an officer replies, in an audio recording made by Shawnee on her cell phone.
Shawnee and Aaron say their son is healthy and nurtured.
Shawnee and Aaron say their son is healthy and nurtured.
But she could explain: The couple have legal prescriptions for the marijuana in their home. His is prescribed for anxiety and chronic pain; hers for depression and anxiety.
"I told them we had our cards, our prescriptions," said Shawnee, 27. "They didn't want to see them."
Not long after that exchange, according to police video of the family's encounter, a social worker arrived at the home and decided to place the child in foster care. CNN is not using Shawnee and Aaron's last names or the name of their child because of the ongoing child protection case.
"I was pleading with them, 'Look, you guys, I understand your perception, but we are wonderful parents, hardworking members of our community,'" said Aaron, 34.
"They could not conceive of the fact that you can be a wonderful parent, a decent human being, and medicate with marijuana."
'Doubling down' on medical marijuana
This is your body on weed
Dr. Gupta: 'You get a distorted picture'
For agencies enlisted to protect children, marijuana in the home has for decades been an invitation for serious speculation about a parent's fitness.
But as the narrative of medical marijuana legalization unfolds across the country, so does a complicated parallel story of patients whose children are being removed to protective custody -- or worse, permanently removed -- ostensibly because of their legal marijuana use. Most medical marijuana legislation does not seem to account for this possibility.
"The judges, the police, CPS (child protective services) have been fighting this war on drugs for so long," said Maria Green, a medical marijuana patient in Lansing, Michigan, whose infant daughter Bree was placed in foster care last year.
"They just can't get it out of their minds that this is an 'evil' drug they have to fight against."
To be sure, each case has unique circumstances, and child welfare officials at both the state and local level do not comment about specific cases while they are in process, or even once they are closed.
Further complicating the picture: While medical marijuana use is legal in 20 states and the District of Columbia, the federal Drug Enforcement Administration classifies the drug as a Schedule I substance with "no currently accepted medical use in the United States" and high potential for abuse.
In cases involving removal of children, medical marijuana found in the home would seem to be barely distinguishable from other Schedule I substances -- such as heroin or ecstasy.
"CPS handles (cases) the same way regardless of what the drug ... is," said Michael Weston, deputy director of public affairs and outreach programs at the California Department of Social Services. "Everything is weighed in reference to, 'Is this a danger to the child? Is there a potential harm to the child? Is this showing signs of abuse or neglect?'"
There have been no substantive studies yet to determine how medical marijuana impacts parenting.
There is early data, according to a researcher, suggesting a small increase in child poisonings among medical marijuana patients in states where it is legal. And early epidemiological data draws a link between medical cannabis use and increased corporal punishment and physical abuse -- but not neglect.
"We really don't know what's going on," said Bridget Freisthler, an associate professor in the department of social welfare at UCLA, who studies medical marijuana use among parents.
"We don't know whether (medical marijuana) affects parenting or whether caseworkers need to be concerned when they find out this is happening in the home."
Parents fighting to maintain custody of their children say the mere presence of medical marijuana is an almost reflexive trigger for removal.
They cite scores of anecdotes concentrated in states where medical cannabis is legal -- children removed from homes where cannabis is used or grown; babies testing positive for marijuana at birth and subsequently removed; children removed because mothers breastfed at the same time that they used medical marijuana.
"Marijuana use does not make someone a bad parent," said Sara Arnold, co-founder of the Family Law and Cannabis Alliance. "It should not be the primary or sole basis for any Child Protective Services investigation."
But simply having a medical marijuana card does not mean that that patient is acting responsibly with the medication; nor does the mere presence of marijuana imply lack of safety, according to experts.
"Medical marijuana as a risk factor by itself doesn't mean the child isn't safe," said Michael Piraino, chief executive officer of National CASA for Children, an advocacy group for abused and neglected children. "Most kids have had risk factors but remain safe.
"But how do you put together all these pieces of information, of evidence, that a child is or isn't safe?"
The answers can be as variable as the homes where medical marijuana is used.
Piraino says issues related to medical marijuana use and parenthood have started to come up for his agency, but not yet in a significant way.
He notes that any drug in the home carries risks, including potential lack of attention to children's needs and physical danger stemming from possible ingestion, but that the extent of those risks with medical marijuana is not clear.
Aaron and Shawnee bristle at the ongoing debate about their parenting, and worse, the notion that their use of cannabis could raise concerns about abuse or neglect of their child. They say their son is healthy, happy and nurtured.
What brought police officers to their home in early January, they say, was an anomaly -- a loud argument. The clamor was heard by a neighbor, who called the police.
When officers later entered their home to investigate, they discovered loose marijuana, cannabis oil, and marijuana cigarettes strewn on the desk in the couple's living room. The living room smelled like marijuana. (Aaron says the smell was lingering from the couple medicating the night before, after their son fell asleep.)
"What I want you to understand is your baby doesn't need to be subject to marijuana," said one officer in the police video.
Shawnee responds, "What makes you think he is?"
"Because your house really smelled bad of marijuana," said the officer.
The smell of marijuana, a home in a disarray, medical cannabis that was visible -- albeit out of the boy's reach -- are the roots of the ongoing case against them.
"We would never allow our children to get into our medical marijuana," said Aaron, adding that he believes stigma against the plant is at the heart of his and other cases. "If (law enforcement and CPS) had come in, even if it was a couple of empty beer bottles or a wine bottle, I don't think anybody would have raised an eyebrow.
"I had the impression that we had turned this corner," he added. "That we had moved past that stigma."
"Is the child happy? Is the child loved? Is the child well cared for?" said Arnold, who stressed that she has no specific information about Shawnee and Aaron's case, but views it through the lens of countless other families she's counseled. "Marijuana on a desk does not mean they're abusing or neglecting the child."
Nor does growing and using marijuana, said Green, the Michigan mother whose 6-month-old daughter was removed from her custody for two months last September.
According to Michigan law, both Green and her husband, Steve, are allowed to use cannabis medically -- she to treat multiple sclerosis, her husband to treat epilepsy. And she is allowed to grow a certain number of plants to supply to other patients.
Green says the plants were grown behind a locked door -- the children never had access to them -- and the couple never medicated in front of the children. They kept the marijuana they used locked up.
She says a custody battle with her ex-husband, involving a son from a previous marriage, led CPS to her door, and she says despite the pains they had taken to shield their children from the marijuana, Bree was removed from the home and assigned to protective custody.
A major issue debated during the case: whether marijuana plants grown in the Green home increased the danger of armed robbery and thus posed a serious safety issue for children in the home -- in other words, whether theoretical risk of harm to a child constitutes a serious safety concern.
Green and other advocates say that theoretical, potential risk is not enough.
"I find it very scary that parents can have children taken away for something that's a potential," said Arnold.
As a consequence of Bree's removal, Maria and Steve Green were ordered to stop using medical cannabis. She says she suffered some pain and had to use a walker at intervals, but Steve was worse off. He suffered nine or 10 seizures during the two months Bree spent in foster care.
"You've got these parents having to choose between their medicine and their family," said Arnold. "That's an impossible choice, especially if your medicine makes you functional enough to parent."
Green says that medical marijuana patients may not realize the risk of a run-in with CPS. She advises patients not to become too lax, and to realize that not everyone -- including law enforcement, CPS, and the judicial system -- views the marijuana plant through the same lens.
"Think about what are you doing with the meds, where are you smoking, who is watching your kids when you're smoking or under the influence?" said Green. "Have those things in place."
"My advice to parents is to really go out of your way to make sure (your children) are not exposed to it."
After spending a few days in jail -- and their son spending 12 days in foster care -- Aaron and Shawnee say they now understand.
They are setting aside their views about marijuana as a medical treatment, and view it -- at least temporarily -- as a potential barrier to maintaining their family unit.
That does not ease their confusion about the law, or their conviction that the plant has medicinal value.
"There are families out there ... destroyed over a medicinal plant," said Aaron. "It's baffling."
Watch Sanjay Gupta MD Saturday at 4:30pm and Sunday at 7:30am ET. For the latest from Sanjay Gupta MD click here.